Meeting ID: 916 5855 1117
Password: as before.
Contact: Aru Ray, Tobias Barthel,Viktoriya Ozornova
Slides are attached on the Talk's page or see our Nextcloud [3]
An (∞,1)-category has been shown to support most theorems and constructions of category theory and, in particular, limits in an (∞,1)-category have been constructed as terminal objects in the (∞,1)-category of cones. In this talk, I will explain how to generalize this construction to (∞,2)-categories.
A good notion of limit in a 2-category is that of a 2-limit, defined as a limit enriched over categories. Unlike its 1-categorical analogue, a 2-limit cannot be characterized as a 2-terminal object in the 2-category of cones. Instead, we need to construct a "shifted2" 2-category of cones to formulate such a result. This issue extends to the ∞-setting and therefore defining limits in an (∞,2)-category is more involved than in the (∞,1)-categorical case. The results in the 2-categorical setting are joint work with tslil clingman, while those in the ∞-setting are work in progress with Nima Rasekh and Martina Rovelli.
Anhang | Größe |
---|---|
[4]Moser_intro.pdf [5] | 14.04 MB |
Links:
[1] http://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/de/taxonomy/term/39
[2] http://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/de/TopologySeminar
[3] https://nextcloud.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/s/Tq9bsCWsAJrRiNk
[4] http://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/de/webfm_send/599/1
[5] http://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/de/webfm_send/599